After E3 and Gent-Wevelgem, cyclingnews.com wrote an article on the winners and losers of the weekend criticizing Team Garmin-Cervelo among others. It writes:
“The team’s tactics in E3 were spot on but
they were steam rolled by Cancellara.”
So let me get this straight. If a team’s tactics are spot on but there is another rider simply stronger on the day, that’s considered a failure? That means that no matter what, any race has one winner, seven team mates and 192 losers. I fully understand that many will proclaim that “this is how the world works”, “this is sport”, etc, but I humbly disagree. Not because I have an affiliation with this team, but on the principle.
In many sports, and particularly in cycling, there are a lot of things you don’t control. Therefore, making the win the only thing that counts is a dangerous approach (in many ways). All you can really do, and I believe all you SHOULD really do as a team, is focus on creating the best possible environment (training, equipment, nutrition, strategy, tactics, communication) for the riders to achieve their optimal performance and for the riders to execute to the best of their ability. If that happens and nobody does it better, you win. If nine other guys are stronger, you come tenth. Either way, your quality of execution is the same.
So to the team I would say, congrats on gelling so quickly and delivering what cyclingnews.com considers the perfect race. That’s all we can ask for. Let me know if you agree or disagree in the comments below or via Twitter (@gerardvroomen).
You can receive an alert when I post a new blog via email, Facebook, Twitter, Skype, LinkedIn or Instant Messenger!