Running wild

August 22, 2013

Sports Illustrated ran an article about anti-doping testing in Jamaica. Five conclusions:

  1. It highlights the problem of how poorer countries should allocate resources to anti-doping. One cannot possibly claim that funding that is more important than funding basic needs.
  2. At the same time, this is of no concern to the athletes competing against the Jamaicans. And the fact is that JADCO is responsible for out-of-competition testing of its athletes even when they are abroad.
  3. If they wanted to, Jamaica could fund the world’s best anti-doping program with just 10% of the proceeds of their millionaire sprinters. So install a testing tax on the athletes, and the problem is solved. Note that if this is a fixed tax that applies to all their athletes indiscriminately, it is not comparable with the Armstrong donation to the UCI. Simply the costs of being a pro athlete.
  4. One would think that for the athletes, this would be a great opportunity to lend credibility to the claim that they’re clean. As it stands, with 1 OOC test in the two most important months of 2012 (when it comes to doping to prepare for the Olympics), suspicion is cast upon all Jamaican athletes. They simply were not tested in a way that any credible statement about them being clean could be made.
  5. Fans of Jamaican sprinters react the same way as Lance Armstrong fans did in the BO-era (Before Oprah)

3 Responses to “Running wild”

  1. Fan Says:

    This could also be expanded to topic: Equality in anti-doping testing, or does it even exist ?

    Way too many examples on this besides Jamaica, also Kenya etc. Just take a look to WADA testing statistics.

  2. slim jim Says:

    The morning after Bolt’s won gold in 2008 a co-worker of mine (also a cycling fan) said, “What did you think of Bolt’s run last night?”

    “He could be the greatest we’ve ever seen or the biggest cheat.”

  3. larryatcycleitalia Says:

    The IAAF should be funding world-wide whereabouts and out-of-competition testing, paid for via proceeds of a tax on the receipts of the big-money track meets. With “Golden” this and “DIamond” that, one would think the money is there.


What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 14,063 other followers